FTC Removes Key AI Guidance Documents
The Federal Trade Commission has quietly removed three significant blog posts from the Lina Khan era that addressed critical issues surrounding artificial intelligence, according to a Wired report. The deleted content included guidance on open-source AI models and warnings about potential consumer harms, signaling a dramatic shift in the agency’s approach to technology regulation under new leadership.
Among the removed posts was “On Open-Weights Foundation Models” from July 2024, “Consumers Are Voicing Concerns About AI” from October 2023, and “AI and the Risk of Consumer Harm” published January 3, 2025. The latter specifically highlighted AI’s potential for “incentivizing commercial surveillance to enabling fraud and impersonation to perpetuating illegal discrimination” – concerns that now appear to have diminished priority within the agency.
Administrative Changes Drive Content Removal
This content purge aligns with broader patterns observed since the Trump administration began directing federal agencies to remove or modify substantial amounts of government content. Following the presidential transition, the FTC underwent significant leadership changes, including the installation of new Chair Andrew Ferguson, who has shifted focus away from Khan’s aggressive antitrust agenda toward deregulation for major technology companies.
The removal of these specific posts appears particularly noteworthy given their focus on consumer protection aspects of AI, which doesn’t align with the current administration’s emphasis on rapid AI development and competition with China. However, the administration’s stated support for open-source initiatives creates some tension with the removal of the “On Open-Weights Foundation Models” post.
Broader Pattern of Government Content Removal
This isn’t the first instance of content removal under the current FTC leadership. In March, approximately 300 posts related to AI, consumer protection, and ongoing lawsuits against tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft were removed from agency platforms. This pattern extends across the federal government, with numerous agencies removing content related to diversity, equity, inclusion, public health, and environmental policy.
As these industry developments continue to unfold, the regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence remains in flux. The FTC’s approach to AI risk assessment and open-source guidance appears to be undergoing significant transformation, raising questions about how consumer protections will evolve alongside rapid technological advancement.
Legal and Transparency Concerns
Legal experts have raised concerns that these content removals might violate both the Federal Records Act, which requires preservation of documents detailing government activities, and the Open Government Data Act, mandating that agencies publish data as “open data” by default. The disappearance of these posts eliminates valuable context about the agency’s evolving stance on critical technology issues.
Meanwhile, recent technology advancements continue to accelerate, creating new regulatory challenges that demand clear guidance from oversight bodies. The absence of published content from Ferguson’s FTC on their technology blog, despite numerous potentially anticompetitive mergers and acquisitions in the AI space, leaves a significant information vacuum.
Industry Implications and Future Outlook
The removal of these guidance documents comes at a critical juncture for AI development and deployment. As companies navigate this changing regulatory environment, understanding the FTC’s current position on issues like open-source AI models and consumer protection becomes increasingly challenging without clear, publicly available guidance.
These developments in AI governance coincide with other significant related innovations across sectors, highlighting the need for consistent regulatory frameworks. The technology sector continues to monitor how these market trends will influence both innovation and consumer safeguards in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.
As the FTC maintains its silence on the reasons for removing these posts, stakeholders across the technology ecosystem are left to interpret the agency’s shifting priorities through its actions rather than its published guidance, creating uncertainty in an already complex regulatory environment.
This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.
Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.
