The Hidden Environmental Cost of AI’s Energy Appetite

Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.

The Unseen Infrastructure Behind Artificial Intelligence

While artificial intelligence promises to revolutionize everything from healthcare to climate solutions, few users consider the physical infrastructure required to power these digital marvels. The AI revolution is quietly driving a fossil fuel renaissance, with major technology companies building massive data centers in energy-rich regions and often generating their own power through direct access to natural gas obtained through hydraulic fracturing.

This trend represents a surprising second act for the fracking industry, which climate advocates had previously criticized for environmental concerns including contaminated water tables, induced seismic activity, and perpetuating fossil fuel dependence. As AI’s computational demands skyrocket, companies are increasingly turning to energy-intensive solutions that carry significant environmental consequences.

Texas Transformation: From Desert to Data Hub

The scale of this transformation is particularly evident in West Texas, where AI coding assistant startup Poolside is developing a 500-acre data center complex approximately 300 miles west of Dallas. Dubbed “Horizon,” the facility will generate two gigawatts of computing power—equivalent to the Hoover Dam’s entire electrical output—by tapping directly into the Permian Basin’s natural gas reserves, where fracking dominates energy extraction.

Poolside isn’t operating alone in this venture. The company is collaborating with CoreWeave, a cloud computing firm providing access to more than 40,000 Nvidia AI chips. This partnership exemplifies what the Wall Street Journal has termed an “energy Wild West,” where regulatory frameworks struggle to keep pace with rapid technological expansion.

Industry-Wide Pattern Emerges

OpenAI’s approach mirrors this strategy. The company’s flagship Stargate data center in Abilene, Texas, requires approximately 900 megawatts across eight buildings. CEO Sam Altman openly acknowledged the facility’s energy source during a recent visit, stating plainly: “We’re burning gas to run this data center.” While the company claims most electricity comes from the local grid—which mixes natural gas with West Texas wind and solar—the complex includes a new gas-fired power plant using turbines similar to those powering warships.

Meanwhile, Meta is pursuing a $10 billion data center in Louisiana’s poorest region, Richland Parish. The facility, spanning 1,700 football fields, will demand two gigawatts for computation alone. Utility company Entergy is spending $3.2 billion to construct three large natural-gas power plants with 2.3 gigawatts of capacity, fueled by gas extracted through fracking in the nearby Haynesville Shale.

These industry developments represent a significant shift in how technology companies approach energy sourcing, with implications for both local communities and global climate goals.

Community Impacts and Local Concerns

For residents near these projects, the rapid development has brought profound changes to daily life. Arlene Mendler, who lives across from OpenAI’s Stargate facility, told the Associated Press that bulldozers eliminated a huge tract of mesquite shrubland without community consultation. “It has completely changed the way we were living,” she said, noting that she moved to the area 33 years ago seeking “peace, quiet, tranquility.”

Water scarcity presents another critical concern in drought-prone regions. During Altman’s Texas visit, the city’s reservoirs were at roughly half-capacity, with residents restricted to twice-weekly outdoor watering schedules. While companies like Oracle claim minimal water usage after initial fillings of closed-loop cooling systems, researchers caution that these assessments can be misleading.

Shaolei Ren, a University of California, Riverside professor studying AI’s environmental footprint, notes that such systems require more electricity, which translates to increased indirect water consumption at the power plants generating that electricity. These related innovations in cooling technology must be evaluated within their broader environmental context.

The Geopolitical Justification

When questioned about building in economically challenged areas, industry leaders point to global competition. Chris Lehane, OpenAI’s vice president of global affairs, framed the energy buildout as essential to national interests. “We believe that in the not-too-distant future, at least in the U.S., and really around the world, we are going to need to be generating in the neighborhood of a gigawatt of energy a week,” Lehane stated, pointing to China’s massive energy expansion of 450 gigawatts and 33 nuclear facilities in just one year.

This perspective has found political support. The current administration has implemented policies that fast-track gas-powered AI data centers by streamlining environmental permits, offering financial incentives, and opening federal lands for projects using natural gas, coal, or nuclear power—while explicitly excluding renewables from similar support.

Questioning the Necessity of New Capacity

One critical aspect largely absent from the conversation is whether all this new energy capacity is genuinely necessary. A Duke University study found that utilities typically use only 53% of their available capacity throughout the year, suggesting significant room to accommodate new demand without constructing additional power plants.

The researchers estimated that if data centers reduced electricity consumption by roughly half for just a few hours during annual peak demand periods, utilities could handle an additional 76 gigawatts of new load—effectively absorbing the 65 gigawatts data centers are projected to need by 2029. This approach could provide breathing room to develop cleaner alternatives rather than rushing to build natural gas infrastructure.

These findings highlight how managing information infrastructure requires considering both technological efficiency and energy optimization strategies.

The Interdependency Challenge

The AI sector has evolved into what some analysts describe as a “circular firing squad of dependencies,” where OpenAI needs Microsoft, which needs Nvidia, which needs Broadcom, which needs Oracle, which needs data center operators who in turn need OpenAI. This self-reinforcing loop creates vulnerability—if the foundation cracks, expensive infrastructure of both digital and gas-burning varieties could be left stranded.

The Financial Times recently noted that OpenAI’s ability to meet its obligations is “increasingly a concern for the wider economy,” underscoring the systemic risks embedded in this rapid expansion. As manufacturing technologies advance, the physical infrastructure supporting digital services becomes increasingly complex and interconnected.

Long-Term Implications and Alternatives

The current building spree raises questions about what happens when technology companies’ contracts expire. Meta has guaranteed it will cover Entergy’s costs for new Louisiana generation for 15 years, and Poolside’s lease with CoreWeave runs for a similar term. The fate of utility customers after these agreements end remains uncertain, potentially leaving regions with underutilized fossil-fuel plants and consumers facing higher electricity bills to finance today’s investments.

Despite the current reliance on natural gas, significant private investment is flowing into alternatives. Small modular reactors, advanced solar installations, and fusion startups like Helion and Commonwealth Fusion Systems have attracted substantial funding from AI industry leaders, including Nvidia and Altman himself. This suggests that even industry insiders recognize the need for cleaner long-term solutions.

As computing technologies evolve, the energy requirements of advanced systems will continue to present both challenges and opportunities for innovation in power generation and efficiency.

Balancing Progress and Responsibility

The rapid expansion of AI infrastructure powered by fracked gas represents a complex trade-off between technological advancement and environmental responsibility. While companies justify their energy choices through geopolitical competition and immediate capacity needs, the long-term consequences for host communities and climate goals cannot be overlooked.

As AI’s energy demands continue to grow, the industry faces increasing pressure to develop more sustainable approaches that balance computational needs with environmental stewardship. The current trajectory suggests we’re at a critical juncture where today’s infrastructure decisions will shape both technological capabilities and environmental outcomes for decades to come.

What remains clear is that the conversation around AI’s future must expand beyond capabilities and applications to include the physical and environmental foundations upon which this digital revolution is being built. The industry’s current market trends point toward continued fossil fuel dependence, but growing investment in alternatives suggests potential for a more sustainable path forward.

This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.