According to Financial Times News, UBS chair Colm Kelleher warned at the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s Global Financial Leaders’ Investment Summit that insurers are creating a “looming systemic risk” through ratings arbitrage on private credit assets. Speaking on Tuesday, Kelleher compared current insurance industry practices, particularly in the US, to pre-2008 financial crisis behavior with subprime loans, noting that smaller rating agencies are providing “private letter ratings” that fuel this arbitrage. The Bank for International Settlements recently confirmed concerns, stating that ratings on private credit assets held by US insurers might be inflated and warning of fire sale risks during financial stress. Kelleher’s warning follows high-profile bankruptcies of Tricolor and First Brands that exposed opacity in the fast-growing private credit industry. This emerging pattern suggests we’re witnessing a dangerous repeat of pre-2008 conditions.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Ghost of 2008 Returns in Private Clothing
What makes Kelleher’s warning particularly alarming is how perfectly it mirrors the pre-2008 playbook, but with different players. Instead of banks packaging subprime mortgages into complex securities, we now have insurers chasing yield in private credit markets through opaque rating mechanisms. The fundamental problem remains identical: when institutions engage in regulatory arbitrage to achieve compliance while taking on hidden risks, systemic danger accumulates silently. The insurance industry’s shift toward private credit represents a classic “reach for yield” in a low-interest-rate environment that persisted for over a decade, creating incentives for precisely this type of behavior.
The Private Credit Time Bomb
The systemic risk here extends beyond just insurance company balance sheets. Private credit markets have exploded to over $1.7 trillion globally, with insurers representing one of the largest investor classes. Unlike publicly traded corporate bonds, these loans lack transparency, trade infrequently, and depend heavily on those private letter ratings that Kelleher highlighted. During economic stress, the combination of illiquidity and questionable valuations could trigger exactly the fire sales that the Bank for International Settlements warned about. The domino effect would spread through pension funds, individual policyholders, and ultimately require government intervention when systemically important insurers face distress.
Regulatory Blind Spots and Coming Reckoning
What’s most concerning is the regulatory gap that has allowed this situation to develop. Insurance regulation traditionally focused on solvency margins and liquid assets, while private credit slipped through as an “alternative investment” category. The rise of specialized rating agencies providing confidential ratings creates a perfect storm where regulators cannot see the accumulating risk until it’s too late. We’re likely 12-18 months away from either a market correction that exposes these vulnerabilities or regulatory intervention that forces transparency. Either scenario will create significant market disruption, particularly for the life insurance sector that has been most aggressive in private credit allocation.
Broader Implications for Financial Stability
This emerging crisis has implications beyond just insurance and private credit markets. It represents another example of how financial innovation consistently outpaces regulation, creating systemic vulnerabilities in supposedly “safe” sectors. The insurance industry’s traditional role as a stabilizer during market stress could reverse if these private credit holdings trigger liquidity crises. Looking forward, we should expect increased regulatory scrutiny of private market valuations, potential capital requirement increases for insurers holding private credit, and possibly even restrictions on the use of private letter ratings for regulatory capital purposes. The warning from UBS leadership should serve as an early indicator that the next financial stress test may come from an unexpected corner of the market.
