According to Forbes, Threads has surpassed X in monthly active users for the first time since its July 2023 launch, marking a significant milestone in the ongoing social media battle between Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. The data from Similarweb shows Threads’ number of daily worldwide mobile users increased 48% year-over-year as of October, while X’s dropped 16%. In the U.S. mobile market specifically, Threads reached 16.6 million daily active users compared to X’s 21.4 million, though X still leads in web traffic with 141.7 million daily users versus Threads’ 7.6 million. The rivalry between the two platforms reflects deeper tensions between the world’s wealthiest individuals, with Zuckerberg ranking fifth at $223.2 billion and Musk leading at $503.9 billion as of this week. This development signals a notable shift in the social media landscape that warrants deeper analysis.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Instagram Integration Advantage
Threads’ most significant strategic advantage lies in its seamless integration with Instagram, which boasts nearly 1 billion daily mobile users worldwide. This built-in user base provides Threads with what amounts to a massive pre-warmed audience that can be easily siphoned from the parent platform. The 30 million downloads on launch day demonstrate the power of this cross-promotion strategy. However, this advantage comes with a critical vulnerability: Threads risks being perceived as merely an extension of Instagram rather than a standalone platform with its own identity and purpose. The question remains whether users are genuinely choosing Threads for its features or simply defaulting to it because of Instagram’s convenience.
The User Retention Problem
While the monthly active user numbers show Threads gaining ground, the platform faces a fundamental challenge with user engagement and retention. Early adoption metrics can be misleading, as many users may try the platform due to Instagram’s prompting but fail to develop habitual usage patterns. The fact that X still dominates web traffic by nearly 20:1 suggests Threads hasn’t yet captured the professional and power-user segments that drive sustained engagement. Monthly active users tell only part of the story – the real test will be whether Threads can maintain this momentum once the novelty wears off and users settle into their preferred platforms for different types of content and interactions.
Platform Identity and Purpose
X’s struggles under Musk’s leadership have created an opening for competitors, but Threads hasn’t clearly defined what makes it fundamentally different or better. The platform initially positioned itself as a more civilized alternative to X’s increasingly chaotic environment, but this reactive positioning may not be sufficient for long-term success. The historical tensions between Musk and Zuckerberg add a dramatic personal dimension to this competition, but users ultimately care about functionality and community, not billionaire rivalries. Threads needs to develop unique features and use cases that aren’t simply reactions to X’s perceived shortcomings.
The Risk of Social Media Fragmentation
This ongoing battle highlights a broader trend toward social media fragmentation, where users are increasingly dividing their attention across multiple specialized platforms. While Threads’ growth is impressive in isolation, it’s occurring in a market where overall social media engagement may be reaching saturation points. The danger for both platforms is that neither becomes the definitive destination for real-time public conversation, instead creating a divided landscape where no single platform achieves critical mass. This fragmentation could ultimately weaken the value proposition of both services, as the network effects that make social platforms valuable depend on concentrated user bases rather than scattered communities.
Long-Term Viability Questions
The financial resources behind both platforms create an unusual dynamic where neither is likely to disappear quickly, regardless of user metrics. However, the history of conflict between these two executives suggests this competition may become increasingly personal and potentially destructive. Both platforms risk making decisions based on competitive positioning rather than user needs, which could lead to feature bloat, confusing interface changes, or other missteps. The real test will come when both platforms need to demonstrate sustainable monetization strategies that don’t alienate their user bases – a challenge that has proven difficult for many social platforms attempting to balance user experience with revenue generation.
