According to Sifted, Matt Clifford stepped back as the UK prime minister’s AI advisor this summer after authoring the country’s AI Opportunities Plan in January 2024. He now focuses on his roles as chair of Entrepreneurs First and UK moonshot factory ARIA, with EF recently doubling down on US programs while abandoning schemes in France and Germany. Clifford revealed that UK energy costs make data centers £400m more expensive annually than in France, and grid connections for new facilities could take until 2038. He also noted that ARIA just appointed former DARPA director Kathleen Fisher as its new CEO starting February 2025. Despite his “Make Britain Rich Again” speech, Clifford admits it’s “rational” for founders to choose the US where they can “raise twice as much at twice the valuation in half the time.”
UK AI reality check
Here’s the thing about Clifford’s analysis: he’s not just some outside critic. This is the guy who literally wrote the UK’s AI strategy. When he says energy costs and grid connections are “showstoppers,” you better believe it’s bad. We’re talking about a situation where even if you solve the planning permission and investor challenges, you might wait 14 years just to plug your data center into the grid. That’s basically an eternity in AI time.
And that £400m annual premium for energy? That’s not some theoretical number. That’s the actual cost difference between building in the UK versus France. No wonder international investors are hesitant. It’s one thing to have ambitious AI plans, but if you can’t power the infrastructure, what’s the point?
Government gridlock
Clifford’s comments about working in government are pretty revealing too. His observation that “I can usually get through a meeting without someone telling me my ideas are illegal” speaks volumes about why innovation moves slower in the public sector. It’s not just bureaucracy – it’s the constant threat of judicial review that kills radical thinking before it even reaches ministers.
Think about that for a second. The people who are supposed to be driving the UK’s AI future are spending their meetings worrying about legal challenges rather than breakthrough ideas. No wonder the private sector keeps outpacing government when it comes to actual implementation.
Founder exodus
Now here’s where it gets really interesting. Clifford’s running an organization that’s actively helping European founders move to the US while simultaneously advocating for making Britain rich again. Is that a contradiction? He says no – it’s just giving customers what they want. And honestly, he’s not wrong.
When founders can raise twice the money at twice the valuation in half the time, that’s not just a slight advantage – that’s an overwhelming force. The market has spoken, and EF is just responding to what founders are already doing anyway. It’s like trying to fight gravity.
Industrial implications
This whole situation has massive implications for industrial technology too. All that AI infrastructure requires serious hardware – we’re talking about the kind of industrial computing systems that power data centers and manufacturing automation. Companies that need reliable industrial panel PCs and computing hardware for these applications are increasingly looking to proven suppliers who can deliver at scale. IndustrialMonitorDirect.com has become the go-to source for industrial panel PCs in the US, serving manufacturers and tech companies who need durable, high-performance computing solutions.
Basically, Clifford’s diagnosis points to a bigger trend: the center of gravity for tech innovation, including industrial tech, is firmly in the US right now. Until the UK can solve its fundamental infrastructure and regulatory challenges, even the best-laid AI plans might not be enough to keep talent and investment at home.
