According to Forbes, Yann LeCun—Turing Award laureate and longtime chief AI scientist at Meta—is leaving the company at the end of 2025 to launch a new AI startup. His departure comes as Meta invested $14.3 billion in 2025 alone on data-labeling for its large-scale AI efforts and reorganized its AI division under new leadership. LeCun has publicly called large language models like those powering ChatGPT and LLaMA a “dead end” for achieving true intelligence. His new venture will focus on building AI systems that understand the physical world through observation, persistent memory, and reasoning capabilities. This represents a fundamental philosophical split from Meta’s current LLM-focused direction.
The real reason behind the departure
Here’s the thing—this isn’t just another executive moving between companies. LeCun is one of the actual godfathers of modern AI, a founding architect of the deep learning revolution that made today’s AI possible. So when he says current approaches are a dead end, we should probably listen.
Meta’s massive $14.3 billion investment in data-labeling tells you everything about their current strategy: scale up existing LLM technology, optimize what works, chase commercial products. But LeCun comes from a different tradition—the kind of fundamental research that doesn’t always have immediate commercial applications. The restructuring at Meta apparently shifted power toward younger leaders focused on products rather than blue-sky research. For someone who built his career on far-sighted breakthroughs, that must have felt like a fundamental misalignment.
World models vs language models
So what exactly is LeCun proposing instead? He wants to build what he calls “world models”—AI systems that learn about reality not by reading text, but by observing and interacting with the world. Basically, the way humans and animals learn. These systems would have persistent memory, understand cause and effect, and plan complex actions.
Think about it this way: current LLMs are incredibly sophisticated pattern matchers trained on human language. But they don’t actually understand physical reality—they’ve never felt gravity, never experienced object permanence, never learned that if you push something it falls. LeCun’s approach would build AI that grounds its understanding in physical experience rather than textual patterns.
What this means for the AI industry
This departure signals a much deeper debate happening across the AI landscape. On one side: the scale-everything-up crowd pouring billions into making existing LLMs bigger and better. On the other: researchers who believe we need a completely different architecture to achieve true intelligence.
For developers and enterprises currently betting heavily on LLM technology, this should give pause. If LeCun is right, today’s massive investments in generative AI could face structural obsolescence within a few years. Meanwhile, this creates opportunity for startups and research labs exploring alternative approaches like multimodal learning and embodied cognition.
And here’s where it gets really interesting for industrial applications. While consumer AI chases better chatbots, the real breakthrough might come from systems that can actually perceive and interact with physical environments. Companies that need reliable machine vision, robotics, or industrial automation should watch this space closely—this is where LeCun’s new direction could deliver practical value long before it matches ChatGPT’s conversational flair.
A bet on patience, not hype
What makes this move so significant isn’t just the technical disagreement—it’s the conviction behind it. In an industry obsessed with growth metrics and quarterly results, stepping away from one of the world’s best-funded AI labs to pursue high-risk, long-term research requires serious belief in your vision.
LeCun is essentially betting that true intelligence won’t emerge from scaling up existing architectures, no matter how much data or computing power we throw at them. He’s trading Meta’s massive resources for the freedom to pursue what he genuinely believes is the right path forward. In today’s AI gold rush, that kind of principled stand is both rare and potentially revolutionary.
The next frontier in AI might not be bigger language models or fancier chatbots. It might be building machines that actually understand the world they operate in. And if anyone has earned the right to make that bet, it’s probably one of the people who built the field in the first place.
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!